>is the new DynamicSupervisor more about naming, so people understand it better, than semantics? It is mostly about naming, the semantics are the same. The Dyn

>is the new DynamicSupervisor more about naming, so people understand it better, than semantics? It is mostly about naming, the semantics are the same. The DynamicSupervisor has a new feature called max_children that Erlang doesn't but that's it. > Oh, and edited to add: does that mean using `:simple_one_for_one` with a `Supervisor` is now deprecated? If so, what's involved in transitioning to the new approach? It will be eventually, probably on v1.8. Good question about transitioning. We should have some docs on that. I will work on it.