7 ms·

With the persona he had created I think it would've been sadder to watch it fade into obscurity rather than go out with a bang.

extension 16y ago
At the very least, he could have done something dramatic yet positive. Pulling down all his code like that, I really think he was out to spite everyone.
- jacquesm 16y ago
  When someone gives you a bunch of stuff that you are able to use for a while and then decides to retract it that's still a net positive to you. You have no right to continue to demand he makes his work available to you. > I really think he was out to spite everyone. If that were the case he would have never written it in the first place.
  - uxp 16y ago
    > If that were the case he would have never written it in the first place. Or written it with some license that stipulates it cannot be used in either closed source or any open source applications, only for 'educational' use. Worse, he could have tried to do it retroactively. I doubt he had that intention.
  - ShardPhoenix 16y ago
    >You have no right to continue to demand he makes his work available to you. He has every right to demand it.
- compay 16y ago
  I have no idea what he was thinking about then when he took his stuff down, so you may be right. But having read his work for a few years I don't think it was spite; that just doesn't seem like him. He worked for years on code and writings with free licenses - so for the most part he didn't really "delete" his work, but rather just stopped distributing it. He must have been aware of this fact when he took his sites/accounts down.
- deleted 16y ago
  [deleted]
tiles 16y ago
In fact, I didn't hear of _why until he disappeared, and @jresig made his testimonial to him. Now retrospectively, I admire his creativity and humor... including an appreciation for his virtual "death", if it was meant to be a part of his overall character. That said, I appreciate that people have made all of his works available online, and those projects stand on their own merits. I don't find much value in celebrating _why himself, since that's his personal project, not ours.
- sprout 16y ago
  On the contrary. _why is an idea more than a man. On a certain level I'd say he closed up shop to make the character a shared memory rather than an individual.
vog 16y ago
You seem to imply that there is no option between those two extremes. However, what about a nice goodbye message, handing over the running sites to some predecessor(s)?
steveklabnik 16y ago
I always said he was just burning his guitar.
Jun8 16y ago
Exactly! Also, I think his disappearance was a strong statement, too (we just don't know what it is). He appeared to be whimsical, but if you read his writings (since I don't know any Ruby this is all I can do) you quickly see that he is anything but. It is obvious that a lot of thought and planning has gone into those "whimsical" essays.
- moultano 16y ago
  Do you have a link to his blog? (It's a hard thing to search for.)
  - Jun8 16y ago
    AFAIK, he didn't have a blog proper. But his writing can be found here: http://viewsourcecode.org/why/ http://viewsourcecode.org/why/. I reread The Poignant Guide every now and then.

extension 16y ago

At the very least, he could have done something dramatic yet positive. Pulling down all his code like that, I really think he was out to spite everyone.

jacquesm 16y ago
When someone gives you a bunch of stuff that you are able to use for a while and then decides to retract it that's still a net positive to you. You have no right to continue to demand he makes his work available to you. > I really think he was out to spite everyone. If that were the case he would have never written it in the first place.
- uxp 16y ago
  > If that were the case he would have never written it in the first place. Or written it with some license that stipulates it cannot be used in either closed source or any open source applications, only for 'educational' use. Worse, he could have tried to do it retroactively. I doubt he had that intention.
- ShardPhoenix 16y ago
  >You have no right to continue to demand he makes his work available to you. He has every right to demand it.
compay 16y ago
I have no idea what he was thinking about then when he took his stuff down, so you may be right. But having read his work for a few years I don't think it was spite; that just doesn't seem like him. He worked for years on code and writings with free licenses - so for the most part he didn't really "delete" his work, but rather just stopped distributing it. He must have been aware of this fact when he took his sites/accounts down.
deleted 16y ago
[deleted]

tiles 16y ago

In fact, I didn't hear of _why until he disappeared, and @jresig made his testimonial to him. Now retrospectively, I admire his creativity and humor... including an appreciation for his virtual "death", if it was meant to be a part of his overall character. That said, I appreciate that people have made all of his works available online, and those projects stand on their own merits. I don't find much value in celebrating _why himself, since that's his personal project, not ours.

sprout 16y ago
On the contrary. _why is an idea more than a man. On a certain level I'd say he closed up shop to make the character a shared memory rather than an individual.

vog 16y ago

You seem to imply that there is no option between those two extremes. However, what about a nice goodbye message, handing over the running sites to some predecessor(s)?

steveklabnik 16y ago

I always said he was just burning his guitar.

Jun8 16y ago

Exactly! Also, I think his disappearance was a strong statement, too (we just don't know what it is). He appeared to be whimsical, but if you read his writings (since I don't know any Ruby this is all I can do) you quickly see that he is anything but. It is obvious that a lot of thought and planning has gone into those "whimsical" essays.

moultano 16y ago
Do you have a link to his blog? (It's a hard thing to search for.)
- Jun8 16y ago
  AFAIK, he didn't have a blog proper. But his writing can be found here: http://viewsourcecode.org/why/ http://viewsourcecode.org/why/. I reread The Poignant Guide every now and then.