3 ms·
I found it really fun to use for 3 years in production. But in retrospect I think Postgres is probably a better fit for what we needed.
by _sdegutis 9y ago
I found it really fun to use for 3 years in production. But in retrospect I think Postgres is probably a better fit for what we needed.
- dominotw 9y ago> But in retrospect I think Postgres is probably a better fit for what we needed. Would love to hear more about this.
- lgrapenthin 9y agoIf after three years you think so only "probably", you probably still aren't confident about your requirements. You don't say to your girlfriend "We had fun the last three years, but probably I'm better off with my ex" unless you have no clue what you are looking for.
- ExactoKnight 9y agoI'm using Postgres for a financial app, and the idea of never updating a value in place sounds very appealing over PostgreSQL's construct of updating in place. I'd love to hear your thoughts about how using Datomic in this immutable sense plays out in practice, because Rich Hickey's talk in favour of it is compelling. https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Datomic-Database-Value https://www.infoq.com/presentations/Datomic-Database-Value