4 ms·
In accordance with the plan, February 29 was omitted in 1700 But 1700 wouldn't be a leap year in regular Western reckoning, either.
by DrScump 9y ago
In accordance with the plan, February 29 was omitted in 1700
But 1700 wouldn't be a leap year in regular Western reckoning, either.
- beeforpork 9y agoBut in the Julian calender, it was. So this omitted leap day shifted the Swedish calender out of sync with the Julian calender.