3 ms·
I find it quit nonsense. And moreover, why don't they sue twitch then too in the first place?
by jaimehrubiks 9y ago
I find it quit nonsense. And moreover, why don't they sue twitch then too in the first place?
- Grue3 9y agoI upvoted because Twitch is a really interesting case. The Levenshtein distance between the trademarks is closer, and Twitch is pretty much entirely focused on video, which makes it encroaching on TWiT's domain of business.
- jjeaff 9y agoThe CEO of twitch presumably didn't have a conversation with Laporte and promise to never get into the video business.
- dezren39 9y agoYeah, I think the thing is though that you have to enforce trademarks early and evenly. You can't enforce for one significant breach and not for another. If you want to allow certain kinds of trademark use then you need to come to a licensing agreement for those specific uses, either by allowing certain forms of use or by allowing specific people to use it. Not a lawyer.