3 ms·
That's literally what it takes to get something patented? For better or worse, maybe by patenting it, we won't see that solution used in many products from othe
by AgentME 9y ago
That's literally what it takes to get something patented? For better or worse, maybe by patenting it, we won't see that solution used in many products from other companies.
Hmm, maybe I should start thinking up annoying things that future software might do for profit, and patent them now to stop companies from doing them for a while.
- paulgb 9y ago> maybe by patenting it, we won't see that solution used in many products from other companies My favorite in this genre is IBM's patent on patent trolling: https://www.google.com/patents/US20070244837 https://www.google.com/patents/US20070244837
- chx 9y agoThen why they didn't weaponize it against patent trolls?
- chopin 9y agoMaybe they don't get targeted?
- TheSpiceIsLife 9y agoMaybe they license it out!
- chrismorgan 9y agoHuh, they even had the guts to put “troll” in the document four times.
- lisper 9y agoGetting a patent on pretty much anything is a relatively straightforward (if somewhat arduous) bureaucratic process. I got one on a device that lets you communicate faster than light: https://www.google.com/patents/US20030133714 https://www.google.com/patents/US20030133714 Of course it doesn't actually work, but figuring out why makes an interesting exercise.
- ladberg 9y agoIs it because quantum entangled particles propagate their changes at the speed of light? Making the invention work, just not any faster than normal methods?
- lisper 9y agoNo, it's a little more subtle than that. If you really want to know, the answer is in this paper: http://www.flownet.com/ron/QM.pdf http://www.flownet.com/ron/QM.pdf Or if you prefer, this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
- shakna 9y ago> Of course it doesn't actually work, but figuring out why makes an interesting exercise. I've always found that kind of interesting. The US lets you patent just about anything. But in my home country, Australia, one of the patent requirements is that it actually appears to function in the way you are claiming it does. ("The application must be for something patentable, like a practical adaption, not for an idea or principle.") I wonder if that has any impact on patent trolling, or if it's just as pervasive.
- lisper 9y agoTheoretically it's a requirement in the U.S. as well. To get a patent, the invention has to be "useful", and presumably to be useful it has to work. But in practice this is never enforced.
- otterley 9y agoThat looks like a patent application, not a grant. You can't claim you have a patent on this yet.
- lisper 9y agoI'm not sure why the application page rather than the grant page is the one turning up in Google's results, but the patent was granted. It is US Patent number 7,126.691, issued October 24, 2006.