4 ms·
I'll bow out here, but I'll just point out that this is a great example of how one's adherence to their ideas makes rational conversation impossible. We can on
by brucephillips 9y ago
I'll bow out here, but I'll just point out that this is a great example of how one's adherence to their ideas makes rational conversation impossible.
We can only communicate to the extent that we agree on the definitions of words, so for you to invent your own definitions, which contradict how other people use the word, as codified in dictionaries, then there's zero hope of reaching shared understanding.
It would be absurd for me to claim that "the sky is brown", the later argue that I was right all along because I'm defining "brown" to be "blue".
- philipov 9y agoI will simply point out that at every opportunity, I have been upfront about what definitions I am adopting and the distinctions I am attempting to make, while you have done nothing but dissemble and create ambiguity, without offering a positive program of your own. I will leave it up to other readers to make their own conclusions.
- brucephillips 9y agoIf I say "the sky is brown", am I being up front that I'm defining "brown" to be the color of the sky?
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]