4 ms·

Something is off here. Why is all of this "dirt" coming out in a nanny employment situation? Plus how in the world did she even know what all these conversat

• londons_explore 9y ago
  Sounds like she is a nanny with an interest in self driving cars, and no real interest in nannying...
• gamblor956 9y ago
  Ford has already pointed out that some of her claims are verifiably false, specifically the allegation about Argo.AI, which she claims she overhead, but which didn't have that name at the time of the conversation. While I don't doubt that Levandowski is capable of some of the things he is alleged to have done, and may have done some of the things alleged, the complaint bears strongly similarities to shakedown lawsuits, especially the statement about the BDSM gear. If she truly had factual support for the allegations she made in the lawsuit (i.e., selling chips overseas, fleeing to Canada to escape charges, etc.), she wouldn't need to include embarrassing details like the BDSM stuff. That's the kind of detail you only include to try to force a settlement before discovery/trial. Given that it's a she said/he said over the phone, it's a trivial matter to match up phone records to prove whether these alleged calls took place. The third parties named in the lawsuit can be subpoenaed (but as non-parties can likely charge the plaintiff and/or defendants for their costs incurred in responding).