4 ms·
> ("anonymously" assuming I'm blocking their cookies, which I would if I were that paranoid) Note that cookies are mostly a convenience vis-a-vis tracking. For
by fixermark 9y ago
> ("anonymously" assuming I'm blocking their cookies, which I would if I were that paranoid)
Note that cookies are mostly a convenience vis-a-vis tracking. For user tracking, there's nothing really stopping the server from vending you a version of their site with custom CSS that loads images with a fingerprint in the URL, which would still work with cookies disabled. That'll get you coherent signal on a session (gluing different sessions together would be a bit more challenging, of course, but I wouldn't be surprised if it were possible).