3 ms·
Blatant spam should obviously be censored, but Valleywag is not "spam." There is at least a sliver of good content over there, and it's on topic. I like the id
by dcurtis 19y ago
Blatant spam should obviously be censored, but Valleywag is not "spam." There is at least a sliver of good content over there, and it's on topic.
I like the idea of requiring sites like XKCD, Valleywag, TechCrunch, and others to get more votes to make it to the front page. When that's implemented, will you then un-ban Valleywag?
- anewaccountname 19y agoHow is that not censorship? You aren't such a hardliner after all, are you?
- dcurtis 19y agoIt allows exceptional stories to pass through the filter. That's a form of censorship, but it's only censoring the spammy, linkbait articles. So, like Paul said, I guess there IS a time when censorship in the answer, and it's for obvious spam.