3 ms·
IANAL and all that - but a key issue here is that she was in the room when he was talking to his lawyer. If so, it might be harder for Levandowski to assert tha
by not_that_noob 9y ago
IANAL and all that - but a key issue here is that she was in the room when he was talking to his lawyer. If so, it might be harder for Levandowski to assert that the conversation was protected under attorney-client privilege. This could open the door to a much bigger can of worms. I’d expect Levandowski has every incentive to settle with her to keep her quiet. Smart nanny.
- dragonwriter 9y ago> I’d expect Levandowski has every incentive to settle with her to keep her quiet. It's a little late to do that, keep the info she has already revealed secret, and prevent her from being subpoenaed in the other cases to which it might be relevant.
- not_that_noob 9y agoNot at all. In fact, it's already happened in this same lawsuit - https://www.recode.net/2017/12/15/16782534/alphabet-waymo-uber-self-driving-lawsuit-jacobs-letter-surveillance https://www.recode.net/2017/12/15/16782534/alphabet-waymo-ub... Uber employee writes a letter making all sorts of damaging claims. He then settles for $4.5M. When made to testify, he "walked back some of the allegations in the letter".