6 ms·
>The point of the U in UBI is that you can discard the expensive bureaucracy. Has there been any research into how to set up UBI that actually remains politica
by DanAndersen 9y ago
>The point of the U in UBI is that you can discard the expensive bureaucracy.
Has there been any research into how to set up UBI that actually remains politically/bureaucratically stable? It seems like any implementation would be extremely vulnerable to media cycles highlighting the plight of some poor single mother who didn't spend her UBI wisely and now can't feed her kids, or a rich billionaire who pocketed his UBI rather than giving it to charity. It doesn't matter how infrequent these cases are, it would happen a nonzero amount of times and that's enough to get media stories trending about it. In the face of that, people would start wanting to build in exceptions or adjustments, at which point you end up with the expensive bureaucracy again.
- Lewton 9y agoPart of the answer is to make it a fixed percentage of the GDP. That would make it politically harder to change, while having a natural fail-safe if it turns out UBI kills productivity