3 ms·

>> Setting people up to fail is a thing. How can so many people apparently not see that? Are you OK with your kids and your spouse and your parents being murde

>> Setting people up to fail is a thing. How can so many people apparently not see that? Are you OK with your kids and your spouse and your parents being murdered by police because... some random POS made a phone call, and "set them to fail"?

DoreenMichele 9y ago
No, of course not. And that isn't a rebuttal of my point that the caller absolutely needs to be held responsible for his actions in this debacle.
- carterehsmith 9y ago
  Yeah that POS needs to be in prison or psychiatric instituton or whatever, we all agree on that. I am more concerned with... killing people. How about... instead of military rifles, we use... tazers, rubber bullets, stun grenades and other non-lethal weapons? That way, we all live, and whoever is accused of crime, can be dealt with judge and jury and so on. In this case, the guy that was murdered by police would be not dead... he may be sore, and also pissed, but that surely beats being dead.
  - _dps 9y ago
    Regular police do use those tools. SWAT is "special weapons and tactics", the heavy-equipment arm of the police used precisely in situations of such danger that normal levels of force are not appropriate (in this case, a situation where they believe there is a hostage and an active shooter). If there is an active shooter and who is a competent marksman and has a perfectly ordinary hunting rifle, approaching them with non-lethal weapons is just giving them more opportunities to kill while they police try to incapacitate them. Note the "pranker" didn't call in an event that would have resulted in normal police being dispatched (say, a domestic disturbance, or somesuch). They specifically called in a situation that demanded immediate application of potentially lethal force against an already active shooter.
    - carterehsmith 9y ago
      I would love to see the numbers. How many "hostages" were saved by these SWAT teams, vs how many innocent people were shot.
- fab13n 9y ago
  If you re-read carefully, you will see that absolutely nobody in this thread ever argued that Tyler wasn't responsible, nor that he shouldn't be charged with manslaughter. He is, he will most likely be found guilty, and we're all happy with that. The point you misinterpret as "pro-Tyler" is that the police officer is probably co-responsible of the manslaughter, and should be charged in addition to (not instead of) Tyler. And this seems infuriatingly unlikely.
  - DoreenMichele 9y ago
    I quoted what I was replying to: By primarily blaming Tyler (who's a super-nasty piece of shit, but that's another issue Maybe you should reread more carefully. A lot of the replies to me have assumed things I did not actually say.

DoreenMichele 9y ago

No, of course not. And that isn't a rebuttal of my point that the caller absolutely needs to be held responsible for his actions in this debacle.

carterehsmith 9y ago
Yeah that POS needs to be in prison or psychiatric instituton or whatever, we all agree on that. I am more concerned with... killing people. How about... instead of military rifles, we use... tazers, rubber bullets, stun grenades and other non-lethal weapons? That way, we all live, and whoever is accused of crime, can be dealt with judge and jury and so on. In this case, the guy that was murdered by police would be not dead... he may be sore, and also pissed, but that surely beats being dead.
- _dps 9y ago
  Regular police do use those tools. SWAT is "special weapons and tactics", the heavy-equipment arm of the police used precisely in situations of such danger that normal levels of force are not appropriate (in this case, a situation where they believe there is a hostage and an active shooter). If there is an active shooter and who is a competent marksman and has a perfectly ordinary hunting rifle, approaching them with non-lethal weapons is just giving them more opportunities to kill while they police try to incapacitate them. Note the "pranker" didn't call in an event that would have resulted in normal police being dispatched (say, a domestic disturbance, or somesuch). They specifically called in a situation that demanded immediate application of potentially lethal force against an already active shooter.
  - carterehsmith 9y ago
    I would love to see the numbers. How many "hostages" were saved by these SWAT teams, vs how many innocent people were shot.
fab13n 9y ago
If you re-read carefully, you will see that absolutely nobody in this thread ever argued that Tyler wasn't responsible, nor that he shouldn't be charged with manslaughter. He is, he will most likely be found guilty, and we're all happy with that. The point you misinterpret as "pro-Tyler" is that the police officer is probably co-responsible of the manslaughter, and should be charged in addition to (not instead of) Tyler. And this seems infuriatingly unlikely.
- DoreenMichele 9y ago
  I quoted what I was replying to: By primarily blaming Tyler (who's a super-nasty piece of shit, but that's another issue Maybe you should reread more carefully. A lot of the replies to me have assumed things I did not actually say.