3 ms·
For the Ireland case we're talking about data about a third party criminal whose data happens to be stored by MSFT exclusively in another country. That's not t
by Consultant32452 9y ago
For the Ireland case we're talking about data about a third party criminal whose data happens to be stored by MSFT exclusively in another country.
That's not the case here with Uber. Uber itself, a Canadian company subject to Canadian law, is being compelled to provide data relevant to its own business within Canada. I would be very surprised if Canada allowed businesses to not provide relevant financial information to the tax man.
- ethbro 9y agoRelevant known financial information, sure. But that's a small, well-defined subset of Uber's corporate footprint. What if the warrant was looking for memos on illegally circumventing local parking laws? Memos that may or may not exist? If Uber hosts that Canadian-focused data on servers outside of Canadian jurisdiction, good luck getting ahold of it unless the government's willing to play the "We'll bankrupt you unless you give us something" card. And my point is that kind of international leverage isn't available to, say, a suburb outside of Toledo. Which effectively means a company willing to play hardball with encryption (at great legal risk if they slip up) can have their cake (illegal corporate policies) and eat it too (not be held liable for illegal policies).
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]