3 ms·

Yes, truly how terrible they are to spend money encouraging the eradication of polio.

• comicjk 9y ago
  Not to mention, polio spreads! If you can eradicate polio in a country for a paltry $100 million, it's in other countries' interest to do so, even if some of the money gets stolen. This is the difference between traditional charity evaluation (which seeks honest management) vs effective altruism (which seeks good done per dollar).
  • simplemath__ 9y ago
    exactly! People can't look past the egregious* waste of money to see that it isnt a waste at all, even if Nigeria should have repaid the debt or Japan should have forgiven it. None of that matters! The result matters! Eradicating polio matters!
• yipopov 9y ago
  >Yes, truly how terrible they are to spend money encouraging the eradication of polio. Yes, that was what the loan was for. Even if it all went to its intended purpose, that doesn't excuse apparently not budgeting for any repayment. I expect that money is currently lining someone's pocket in Lagos. I'd have been more impressed if they spent the money directly to tackle the next challenge and letting the politicians answer personally to Japan regarding the whereabouts of their money. Instead they are encouraging more loans and more corruption.
  • deleted 9y ago
    [deleted]