4 ms·
at the very least conspiracy to obstruct
by justinjlynn 9y ago
at the very least conspiracy to obstruct
- Consultant32452 9y agoIf the police have a warrant for the data on that machine, then remotely locking it down will not matter. All this protects Uber from is fishing expeditions where the police hope to come across an "unlocked door" so they can sift through everything hoping to find something. I get that we don't like Uber, but I support this type of action and think it should be standard operating procedure for every organization.,
- justinjlynn 9y agoThis has nothing to do with liking or disliking uber. If the police are executing illegal searches then Uber has every right to sue and recover damages. They, unlike your average natural person, have the coffers to pay for it such that they acquire the "don't fuck with us illegally or we'll financially ruin your department" reputation. What I am worried about is the employee that gets directed to lock things down and then, as a result, is possibly personally targeted by police and prosecutor both for it.