It also could go to subsidies the free (or cheap) extensions. For example: .com could cost 15$ instead of 7$, but .net could go from 7$ to 3$ or even less. Ye

It also could go to subsidies the free (or cheap) extensions. For example: .com could cost 15$ instead of 7$, but .net could go from 7$ to 3$ or even less. Yes, you would end up with Internet ghettos, and "high-street" areas, but given it's only the extension, and a .com address is not really surrounded by other .com addresses, then it's not such a bad thing.