4 ms·
I think it is a bit harsh. Most of the initial commenters couldn't read the article due to paywall, that seems very on-topic. http://archive.is/l5uLn http://a
by AdamJacobMuller 9y ago
I think it is a bit harsh.
Most of the initial commenters couldn't read the article due to paywall, that seems very on-topic.
http://archive.is/l5uLn http://archive.is/l5uLn works well to paywall-bypass.
> If you have an issue with that then you should have HN shouldn't allow paywalled sites/articles to be posted.
I'm a bit torn about that. These are good articles, they should be posted/discussed.
You could link to things like the paywall bypass link I sent instead, but, there are infinite variations of those so you could end up with infinite threads about the same article which seems like a poor solution.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]
- rabidonrails 9y agoI'm not sure you read my comment...we are saying the same thing.
- AdamJacobMuller 9y agoI was trying to agree with you :)