3 ms·
those people can be on the free .web extension...or the .nets/.orgs. The new pricing would only apply to .coms. as far as where money goes, infrastructure impr
by vaksel 16y ago
those people can be on the free .web extension...or the .nets/.orgs. The new pricing would only apply to .coms.
as far as where money goes, infrastructure improvement.
- nanairo 16y agoIt also could go to subsidies the free (or cheap) extensions. For example: .com could cost 15$ instead of 7$, but .net could go from 7$ to 3$ or even less. Yes, you would end up with Internet ghettos, and "high-street" areas, but given it's only the extension, and a .com address is not really surrounded by other .com addresses, then it's not such a bad thing.