> relying on human persistence of vision FYI: persistence of vision was debunked back in 1912[1], 1976[2], and again in 1993[3]. It's still taught in film clas

> relying on human persistence of vision FYI: persistence of vision was debunked back in 1912[1], 1976[2], and again in 1993[3]. It's still taught in film classes, and they justify this by claiming that it's "disputed". It's not disputed, it's downright incorrect. Please stop referring to it, as this only confounds the idea, and helps it with false validity. [1]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34413805_Experimentelle_Studien_uber_Sehen_von_Bewegung https://www.researchgate.net/publication/34413805_Experiment... [2]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268400050_The_Myth_of_Persistence_of_Vision https://www.researchgate.net/publication/268400050_The_Myth_... [3]: https://www.jstor.org/stable/20687993?seq=1#page_scan_tab_contents https://www.jstor.org/stable/20687993?seq=1#page_scan_tab_co...