3 ms·
> I consider network censorship to be a feature, not a bug. No one’s going to stop you from using an unfree, censorious system if you want to. However, we’re g
by wyager 9y ago
> I consider network censorship to be a feature, not a bug.
No one’s going to stop you from using an unfree, censorious system if you want to. However, we’re going to object vociferously if you try to force it on everyone else.
> I want my uber driver to have insurance and a quick background check.
The advantage of censorship-resistant markets is that added features are opt-in. I don’t really care if my uber driver is regulated according to taxi union rules, so I’d rather not pay the associated costs.
- QAPereo 9y agoThe average person wouldn’t even know what you were talking about, never mind actively trying to stop you from pursuing it. The only way they try to enforce anything on you is by dominating the market for a given service, and you are not going to change that.
- cgmg 9y agoHow is your comment relevant to the GP? Did you mean to reply to someone else?
- bkor 9y ago> No one’s going to stop you from using an unfree, censorious system if you want to. However, we’re going to object vociferously if you try to force it on everyone else. You didn't really answer the bits where he was more or less discussing government regulations. Your answer doens't relate to what he stated.
- wyager 9y agoI probably didn’t care about those parts of his comment. Why did you think I needed to address them? Actually, looking back, which bits are you even talking about?