4 ms·
This is purely an advertisement promoting the sale of a new book, correct? It looks like an interesting and useful book written by someone well-known to HN rea
by tombrossman 9y ago
This is purely an advertisement promoting the sale of a new book, correct? It looks like an interesting and useful book written by someone well-known to HN readers, but it is just a web page announcing a book for sale. Serious question - Is this OK for story submissions now?
I nearly flagged it but I think I'll hold off and see if linking to ads is the new norm here, because I haven't noticed that before.
Edit: whoops, should have read this before posting "Please don't complain that a submission is inappropriate. If a story is spam or off-topic, flag it. Don't feed egregious comments by replying; flag them instead. If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did." Apologies, I'll leave my original comment for the curious but won't ask this question again.
- detaro 9y agoIt's not a new book: it was published 2011. It's just very good and recommended book of a relevant field.
- unethical_ban 9y agoIt's an odd thing to balance: Many posts on HN are blogs, which are just one person (hopefully with some credibility) that has something to say. Why then can people not effectively use HN as a blog, subject to some submission limit? Likewise, if an intelligent person writes a useful book or service (Show HN), what is inappropriate about sharing it?
- jnordwick 9y agoA book "review" by the author himself is basically an advertisement. I flagged it.
- packetslave 9y agobut... it wasn't submitted by the author, and it's not even pretending to be a review. It's a "here's info about a book I wrote, with a bunch of links to other peoples' reviews" page on the author's personal site.
- jnordwick 9y agoStill biased. Do you expect to find balanced, informative links or simply ones that pump the book? So somebody submitted a link to an ad for a book, makes no difference who submitted it.
- jwilk 9y agoFrom the HN guidelines: If you flag something, please don't also comment that you did.
- jnordwick 9y agoI sometimes ignore that when flagging articles. There is no way to say why you flagged something except to comment. Also I think that is more about comments that are nothing more than saying you flagged something. If a comment is acceptable without the words "flagged" then it should be acceptable with those extra few letters. I have noticed a lot of quasi press releases and advertisements on the site lately.