3 ms·
That is why i said it seems a little late. I remember stabbing my eyes out when i first got into rails once i tried deploying stuff, back in the fastcgi/lighttp
by thomasswift 19y ago
That is why i said it seems a little late. I remember stabbing my eyes out when i first got into rails once i tried deploying stuff, back in the fastcgi/lighttpd days.
btw, switchpipe is going to rule the world in a few months, the support for all the other frameworks looks awesome.
- petercooper 19y agoTo be fair, fastcgi wasn't /too/ bad IF you actually had it running well at least once g and that varied incredibly from machine to machine, alas. It did use a similar underlying mechanism to most of these other alternatives, just in a rather messy way. I don't think SwitchPipe will rule anything, but perhaps once it's up on Github (instead of SVN) and I release the next version, more baby steps can be made. I'd love to make it even more simple somehow, and perhaps port it to a much faster base (probably Python).
- thomasswift 19y agofair enough :)
- davidw 19y agoYeah, I've had good luck with mod_fcgid, actually. I don't have that much traffic, but I like the fact that the software takes care of setting up and tearing down new instances of the application server, rather than having to take a wild guess at how many mongrel instances might be needed per virtual host. This is something that mod_rails also promises to do well.