4 ms·
They included purescript (compilers), so why not elm, which has orders of magnitude more users?
by platz 9y ago
They included purescript (compilers), so why not elm, which has orders of magnitude more users?
- dom96 9y agoSimilarly, I wonder if they included Nim[1]. While it's use as a compile-to-js language is more niche I think it deserves to be among the likes of ClojureScript. 1 - https://nim-lang.org https://nim-lang.org
- phillipcarter 9y agoDo you have anything to back up the assertion that it has orders of magnitude more users? I'm a fan of elm, but but overall population of functional programmers is quite small, so I wouldn't be shocked of Elm, PureScript, and Reason had similar populations of developers.