3 ms·
The leap you're making, that I don't understand, is that if people didn't have to work, they'd start having huge families en masse. Why do you think that would
by Frondo 9y ago
The leap you're making, that I don't understand, is that if people didn't have to work, they'd start having huge families en masse.
Why do you think that would happen? Is there any basis for having that concern?
- godzillabrennus 9y agoSex is fun, it’s free, and procreation is a biologically driven part of being human. The argument is that if we give people a basic sustainable way to live and the least motivated to improve their condition will likely fall back to the basics.
- yorwba 9y agoChildren are annoying, though. I doubt most people would start having huge families if they can easily prevent it while still having sex.