4 ms·
No they don't? Alpine uses the BusyBox deamons (initd, evdev etc.) And Gentoo uses openrc. Both of these are much easier to tweak than systemd. Same for the net
by swiley 9y ago
No they don't? Alpine uses the BusyBox deamons (initd, evdev etc.) And Gentoo uses openrc. Both of these are much easier to tweak than systemd. Same for the network manager replacements and so on.
Different distros (that aren't just modified Debian or redhat) can differ by quite a lot.
- majewsky 9y ago> Both of these are much easier to tweak than systemd. Disagree. The documentation for systemd is very detailed, and while it is in fact different from sysvinit (which I believe is 90% of the criticism), it is remarkably consistent with itself (compared to a feature-equivalent set of 100 separate tools). The big achievement of systemd is that it steamrolls over a ton of idiosyncrasies that distributions built over the decades. These days, I can just SSH into a random distribution (Arch, Debian, Ubuntu, Redhat, Suse) and everything works as I expect (querying the status of services, finding logs, issuing administrative commands, etc.).