3 ms·
I should add that there's one area where blockchain systems have a pretty strong advantage: establishing a sequence of events. Court cases often come down to w
by jacques_chester 9y ago
I should add that there's one area where blockchain systems have a pretty strong advantage: establishing a sequence of events.
Court cases often come down to who had the better evidence. If you sue me saying you never approved something, but I have meeting minutes showing otherwise, then I am more less going to win by default. Likewise if I say you never had authority to withdraw money from the company account, but you can produce a copy of an authority letter held by the bank with your name on it, you win.
Blockchain promises to shortcut a lot of evidentiary stuff, which is a win. That's why there are so many banks interested in distributed ledgers, title registries, supply chain custody and so on.
- tylersmith 9y agoAll that a blockchain does is establish a sequence of events. It doesn't have to be a sequence of state transitions, it just usually has been.
- jacques_chester 9y agoI don't really follow what you're saying, but I assume you're pointing out an implication I've missed.