4 ms·
Source, please? I was unaware of this sentiment.
by ramses0 9y ago
Source, please? I was unaware of this sentiment.
- jacquesm 9y agohttp://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mother-of-sandy-hook-school-gunman-adam-lanza-was-a-prepper-survivalist-preparing-for-economic-and-8422298.html http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mother-of-s...
- joering2 9y agoWhat a source! If you reason that survivalists have caused some many death because Lanza was survivalist, then lets continue with your thought process: - Lanza was white - hence to date white people have caused more deaths than their preparations have saved. - Lanza was male - hence to date men have caused more deaths than their preparations have saved. - Lanza was a minor - hence to date minors have caused more deaths than their preparations have saved. Did I miss something?
- jacquesm 9y agoYes, you've missed something. If the lady had not been a prepper then she would not have brought a whole bunch of guns into a house with a kid that was clearly having problems. And instead of preparing for the problems that she never had she might have spent more time on the problems that she - and he - clearly did have. Being white, male or a minor has nothing to do with it.
- ramses0 9y agoSo to clarify, does this describe the gist of your original sentiment? "She was a prepper. She prepped for nuclear war. Her son had problems. She did not prep her son for day-to-day life problems, and her son used her weapons to kill people. Therefore, being a prepper has killed people." Honestly trying to understand your POV.