2 ms·
Yes. Dimensionality can be a little tricky here; what's meant is that eight dimensions are required to express some of the simplices, if we were to interpret th
by EtDybNuvCu 9y ago
Yes. Dimensionality can be a little tricky here; what's meant is that eight dimensions are required to express some of the simplices, if we were to interpret them geometrically.
Honestly, I'm more interested in the cohomological features of this network, which would help us find loops and other curiosities in high dimensions. I figure that there have to be some interesting loops in there somewhere.
- pygy_ 9y agoI agree that looking for loops would be interesting but they actually discard subgraphs without a source and a sink, i.e. loops. https://youtu.be/akgU8nRNIp0?t=2m23s https://youtu.be/akgU8nRNIp0?t=2m23s
- qubex 9y agoAs an applied mathematician (and one that put himself through the paces of the mental contortions necessary to understand Penrose's twistor theory) I reckon I'm one of the few people here that actually know what “cohomological” means, and agree with you.