3 ms·
It's only declining in the places where people give a shit about the Planet in these terms.
by mrdodge 9y ago
It's only declining in the places where people give a shit about the Planet in these terms.
- lumberjack 9y agoThey "give a shit" but at the same time pollute a thousand times more (per capita). So one less American and one more Indian is a net positive for our green earth.
- thriftwy 9y agoI'm not sure about that. USA has a lot of nature preserves and strict environment laws. 3rd world countries may experience runaway population growth where no land left undisturbed and nothing is preserved. If we take CO2 it's another thing, but low emissions won't save you once all the biosphere is literally eaten.
- dominotw 9y agoThat has nothing to do with cost to earth. We just export our pollution to seas and china. If all countries start living like americans we'd need 5 times the surfaces area of earth.
- thriftwy 9y agoPreserving biosphere is precious. "Cost to earth" is meaningless by itself - the planet isn't going anywhere. The only fragile thing here is biosphere. I can see that you don't actually value Earth, just pity that it's so small you have to ration it.
- z0r 9y agoOne of the funnier aspects of the stereotypical basket of progressive views is that they end up holding their own societies to high standards and criticize qualities of those societies that were necessary for the fostering of their own worldview.