3 ms·
Edit: The below is incorrect. The weight reduction surprisingly doesn’t have a lot to do with battery capacity. https://www.cnet.com/news/macbook-pro-october-
by jackvalentine 9y ago
Edit: The below is incorrect.
The weight reduction surprisingly doesn’t have a lot to do with battery capacity.
https://www.cnet.com/news/macbook-pro-october-2016-battery-life/ https://www.cnet.com/news/macbook-pro-october-2016-battery-l...
- lower 9y agoOk, so they couldn't increase the battery capacity. But why did they reduce it from 99.5 watt-hours to 76.0 watt-hours rather than just keeping it?
- jackvalentine 9y agoHalf in what terms?
- lower 9y agoI looked at the wrong rows in the table of capacities. So it's not a reduction by half. I corrected my message. But it's still a reduction in capacity (from 99.5 watt-hours to 76).
- jackvalentine 9y agoYou know what, I was under the impression the 15" had a 99.5wh battery. My mistake.