3 ms·
I've always viewed releases as two schedules of 12 months. i.e. one potentially not all that stable build (x.10) and one stable "safe" build (x.04). I'd never
by ErrantX 16y ago
I've always viewed releases as two schedules of 12 months. i.e. one potentially not all that stable build (x.10) and one stable "safe" build (x.04).
I'd never really use a x.10 build in production myself.
- endtime 16y agoIs there any justification for that distinction? That is, does Canonical consider the x.10 builds experimental and the x.04 builds stable? I've never heard that.
- ErrantX 16y agoNo, just my personal experience. It's not entirely true for evey release but I find it a good rule if thumb.
- andrerobot 16y agoIMO it's just better to stick to LTS releases, Canonical tends to make less experimental changes in those releases, because things should work for 3 years. In the other hand, on post LTS releases like 10.10 (which is a x.10 release) they have more freedom to do more under the hood changes.