Obama's FCC only employed title II to impose net neutrality because the previous statutory regime under which they imposed it was successfully crushed by Verizo

Obama's FCC only employed title II to impose net neutrality because the previous statutory regime under which they imposed it was successfully crushed by Verizon in court. To say that opponents of title II would support some other regime is, frankly, bullshit; they're the reason we ended up here in the first place, and there's solid precedent that Verizon, Comcast, etc., would oppose any future regime that might be proposed. I think it's fair to call all of those possible regulatory schemes, collectively, "net neutrality."