> which is why they will NOT send their kids to these schools, instead opting to self-segregate and send their kids to private schools Blue states still have b

> which is why they will NOT send their kids to these schools, instead opting to self-segregate and send their kids to private schools Blue states still have better public schools than red states https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/articles/how-states-compare https://www.usnews.com/education/best-high-schools/articles/... So even if they are sending them to private schools, the public schools that "they won't send them to" STILL do better than the public schools in conservative states. > while at the same time bashing conservatives who wish to do the same. Those wealthy liberals pay for both the local public school and the private school. They aren't exempt from taxes because they send their kids to private school. This is why they bash conservatives, for their desire to defund public education. > That's because the link between funding and performance is tenuous at best So if funding is irrelevant and liberal states provide better education, what's the next post-rationalization to justify downvotes for unsubstantiated political claims?