3 ms·
If there is an effect on the US consumer, it's at the wireless service level not phone level. >Huawei engineers and executives also make regular visits to U.S.
by kharms 9y ago
If there is an effect on the US consumer, it's at the wireless service level not phone level.
>Huawei engineers and executives also make regular visits to U.S. carriers to show off new technology, and the potential cost savings are “significant”—sometimes even half off competitors’ prices, says one former U.S. telecom executive.
>U.S. wireless service costs $41 per month per customer on average, according to the data and analytics firm—second only to Canada, which also largely discourages Huawei equipment. In the U.K., where Huawei is allowed but closely scrutinized, the average wireless bill is $23 a month.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/huawei-long-seen-as-spy-threat-rolled-over-u-s-road-bumps-1515453829 https://www.wsj.com/articles/huawei-long-seen-as-spy-threat-...
- kevin_thibedeau 9y agoTelco price gouging has nothing to do with shunning Huawei.
- chatmasta 9y agoDoes anyone really believe that even I f the US carriers saved 50% on capital costs by purchasing Huawei products, they would pass these savings into the consumer?