> I would also bet the database is probably not much bigger then the shazam app itself. I don't know what you're trying to say here. Shazam has millions of son

> I would also bet the database is probably not much bigger then the shazam app itself. I don't know what you're trying to say here. Shazam has millions of songs in their database, according to the original paper the offline mobile recognition system by google just has something over 70k finger prints. That's the big benefit of using an online system, you don't have to have all the fingerprints stored locally and also don't have to stick to the low power constraint.