3 ms·
> and why should we believe they're the most effective? Whoever gave you that idea? That practice has nothing to do with how the world is changed. I believe
by ringaroundthetx 9y ago
> and why should we believe they're the most effective?
Whoever gave you that idea?
That practice has nothing to do with how the world is changed.
I believe most charities practice this, I saw a presentation on it with a bunch of accredited investors, don't have the source.
You can't will your alternate reality into existence.
- lkbm 9y ago> > and why should we believe they're the most effective? > Whoever gave you that idea? 1. This quesiton makes no sense. 2. The question is how high the returns are--do they exceed the returns of investment. That would depend on the effectiveness of the charity. > I believe most charities practice this, I saw a presentation on it with a bunch of accredited investors, don't have the source. Charities report their opex. I've never seen one listed as 95%. Most are <10%. Some, like Mozilla and ACLU are split between Foundation and Corporation, but most are not. > You can't will your alternate reality into existence. So...you made some claims. I asked for evidence. You refused. I provided counter-evidence. I'm pretty sure you're just trolling now. Or arguing in bad faith, at minimum.