I would be considered opposed to homosexuality I'm keen to hear what you consider it to mean to be "opposed to homosexuality". If you were to consider homosex

I would be considered opposed to homosexuality I'm keen to hear what you consider it to mean to be "opposed to homosexuality". If you were to consider homosexuality a disordered condition (i.e. disease), then being "opposed" to it is pretty nonsensical, in the same way it would be meaningless to be "opposed" to autism or "opposed" to diabetes. If that's not the case, then would you consider yourself to be "opposed" to it in the legal sense (homosexual acts should be illegal)? The social sense (homosexuality should be publicly shunned)? The civic sense (homosexual relationships should have no civic legitimacy)?