3 ms·
It requires Docker for now. A lot of people use it on macOS successfully. What are you seeing?
by sqs 9y ago
It requires Docker for now. A lot of people use it on macOS successfully. What are you seeing?
- pvg 9y agoInstalled it, configured it, pointed it at the public cpython repo, it said 'cloning' and then pegged cpu for about 15 minutes (with about a third to a half of the usage in 'system') and eventually kernel-panicked.
- sqs 9y agoSorry about that. What version of macOS and Docker for Mac? We’ll look into that now.
- pvg 9y agoOS 10.13.3 (17D34a) and Docker 17.12.0-ce-mac46 (21698). I don't think it's you, Docker is just still a bit flaky there, which is why I'm asking. I'll try it with something smaller.
- swsieber 9y agoI've heard that docker does have a (inconsistent) CPU usage issue on OS X. I would definitely pin it on docker.
- sqs 9y agoThanks. Theoretically it'd be possible for us to ship a static Go binary for everything except for our syntax highlighter and the (very convenient) bundled PostgreSQL and Redis. We'll monitor the feedback we get and see how to prioritize this. It definitely helps to hear that Docker did not work well for you.
- bdcravens 9y agoDocker for Mac has known issues with file system. You may want to try docker-sync for the volumes.
- deleted 9y ago[deleted]