3 ms·
Over the years I learned most of what is in the early OReilly book below through daily use of the commonly used programs it describes. However I still go back
by aplorbust 9y ago
Over the years I learned most of what is in the early OReilly book below through daily use of the commonly used programs it describes.
However I still go back to this book for the troff examples. The troff manuals I have seen are fine by me, but I believe this book provides more "working examples".
http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/utp/ http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/utp/
http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/utp/UnixTextProcessing.pdf http://www.oreilly.com/openbook/utp/UnixTextProcessing.pdf
Whenever I read this book again, I am reminded of how much UNIX know-how is probably being lost to new generations that are steered away from learning the foundations that still make up their operating systems.
(No matter how many programs have been or will be subsequently written to "replace" them, it is still not difficult to find these old programs on millions of computers. Avoiding any debate of why they are there, it is uncontestable that when one knows how to use them, they work wonderfully for the simple things that computer users will always need to do.)
Be warned, if one demonstrates the effective use of such old programs to others who have committed themselves to todays large, complex software, the reactions may not be positive. They might be dismissive or insulting, they might accuse one of being a "luddite", or perhaps a "neckbeard" practicing some unexplained type of "elitism".
The uninitiated person who sees the results of UNIX text processing as nothing short of "magic" is rare indeed. It is that person who might enjoy this book.
- digi_owl 9y agoIndeed. With Linux in particular there is a growing sub-set of the community that see the unix inheritance as something to be ignored or even vilified.
- flavio81 9y ago>the unix inheritance as something to be ignored or even vilified. And I agree with them. Unix was never a great or even a good system. It was just a way to have a multiuser system on a cheap hardware. Already in the late '70s, UNIX was behind the state of the art, compared to the Xerox systems and -even more- the Lisp Machines. Unix was technologically a regression. See "The UNIX Haters Handbook." Note: I have worked as a Linux sysadmin in the early 2000s. I used to love it.