5 ms·

Vimeo Releases Embeddable HTML5 Video Player

53 points by sant0sk1 16y ago

aw3c2 16y ago
That is fantastic news. I hope Youtube is not far behind. Vimeo has always been one of my favourite video sites. If they would allow "gaming" videos I would use them for hosting too.
- Terretta 16y ago
  You're welcome to host gaming videos at http://vive.ly http://vive.ly. Try it out using invite code: hd4yc Encode and publish your own HD video site on your own custom domain or embed individual videos using your choice of player stack. (We transcode, store, and stream H.264, Ogg, and WebM.)
  - aw3c2 16y ago
    If comment flagging was possible I would have flagged this post (edit: for being spammy). edit: Below comment is not why I would flag a comment, not sure why one would think so. Paying for video hosting is something I would never consider. Archive.org hosts mine now.
    - chc 16y ago
      You would flag a post because you're cheap? That seems really unnecessary.
      - aw3c2 16y ago
        No, I would flag it because it was blatant promotional spam of someone pitching their product.
        chc 16y ago
        It was a pitch, but it wasn't spam. He was just telling you that he had something similar to what you were looking for. People talk about their products here all the time. Heck, Patrick McKenzie's posts about his product are some of the most popular in HN history. Talking about startups is one of the stated purposes of Hacker News. Surely you've noticed this in all the time you've been a member.
- aaroneous 16y ago
  Youtube started testing this about a month ago: http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-videos.html http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-...
  - mxavier 16y ago
    Slightly off topic but I really hate how youtube tests stuff. I'm sure theres some rhyme or reason to it but from the end-user's perspective it just seems random. Example: I really like the "lower lights" feature on hulu which darkens the page background around the video. I remember for several months I would come across a button to do the same thing on youtube but it would only show up maybe 5% of the time. I can see no reason why that feature would be dependent on the video itself because it has to be just a simple CSS/JS trick.
- tmugavero 16y ago
  Our site has HTML5 embeds (mp4), QR Codes for each video, and is free to use. Hit me up at info(at)moovatom.com if you want a beta account which lets you brand videos, get extensive reporting etc. Go here to try it free w/o needing to sign up: http://www.moovatom.com/u http://www.moovatom.com/u
carson 16y ago
It seems like it is about time Vimeo did this although right now there is no indication that they actually have. The RRW story doesn't link to anything that has the announcement from them and there is nothing on the Vimeo site about it either.
- nanairo 16y ago
  Why is it "about time"? You make it sound like Vimeo is years behind the pack, but in fact---if my understanding is correct---they are at the front, at least in regards to other big video hosting such as Youtube.
  - carson 16y ago
    I agree they aren't that far behind but it is frustrating that they have taken a while to do it. The reason I say frustrating is because I use Google reader on an iPhone/iPad and if the feed includes a Youtube video it gets pulled in as html5. Youtube has had support for html5 video for a while now. Hopefully this change by Vimeo will be reflected in Google reader now as well.
    - app 16y ago
      I haven't used Google Reader on an iPad/iPhone but I think it's unlikely YouTube is using HTML5 there. Mobile Safari actually has a built in parser for YouTube embed code, so nearly any YT embed will work even thought it's clearly an <embed> tag right to a SWF. Normally Mobile Safari will completely ignore *.swf URLs. So in some sense we're just now getting feature parity, in another we're ahead. Disclosure: I work for Vimeo.
      - carson 16y ago
        It looks like I wasn't remembering the Youtube announcement correctly. I was thinking of this: http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2010/05/little-bit-of-polish.html http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2010/05/little-bit-of-polis... I believe that just says they are letting video and audio tags through. When those are in the feed the ipad can play the video inline in reader. A little testing seems to show that they are also letting their iframe embed through as well and when you use that you do get the html5 version of the player on the ipad and iphone. It looks like the Vimeo iframe embed isn't allowed to pass though but hopefully they will allow it. I put together a demo feed that shows the difference if anyone is interested: http://serveany.s3.amazonaws.com/soclose.atom http://serveany.s3.amazonaws.com/soclose.atom
staunch 16y ago
Now will someone get Charlie Rose a damn Vimeo account so I can watch him on my iPad?
samratjp 16y ago
Sweet! I hope this will be just as fruitful as Scribd's transition to HTML5. iPad naysayers, whaddaya say ye now? Ha!

53 points by sant0sk1 16y ago

aw3c2 16y ago

That is fantastic news. I hope Youtube is not far behind. Vimeo has always been one of my favourite video sites. If they would allow "gaming" videos I would use them for hosting too.

Terretta 16y ago
You're welcome to host gaming videos at http://vive.ly http://vive.ly. Try it out using invite code: hd4yc Encode and publish your own HD video site on your own custom domain or embed individual videos using your choice of player stack. (We transcode, store, and stream H.264, Ogg, and WebM.)
- aw3c2 16y ago
  If comment flagging was possible I would have flagged this post (edit: for being spammy). edit: Below comment is not why I would flag a comment, not sure why one would think so. Paying for video hosting is something I would never consider. Archive.org hosts mine now.
  - chc 16y ago
    You would flag a post because you're cheap? That seems really unnecessary.
    - aw3c2 16y ago
      No, I would flag it because it was blatant promotional spam of someone pitching their product.
      - chc 16y ago
        It was a pitch, but it wasn't spam. He was just telling you that he had something similar to what you were looking for. People talk about their products here all the time. Heck, Patrick McKenzie's posts about his product are some of the most popular in HN history. Talking about startups is one of the stated purposes of Hacker News. Surely you've noticed this in all the time you've been a member.
aaroneous 16y ago
Youtube started testing this about a month ago: http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-videos.html http://apiblog.youtube.com/2010/07/new-way-to-embed-youtube-...
- mxavier 16y ago
  Slightly off topic but I really hate how youtube tests stuff. I'm sure theres some rhyme or reason to it but from the end-user's perspective it just seems random. Example: I really like the "lower lights" feature on hulu which darkens the page background around the video. I remember for several months I would come across a button to do the same thing on youtube but it would only show up maybe 5% of the time. I can see no reason why that feature would be dependent on the video itself because it has to be just a simple CSS/JS trick.
tmugavero 16y ago
Our site has HTML5 embeds (mp4), QR Codes for each video, and is free to use. Hit me up at info(at)moovatom.com if you want a beta account which lets you brand videos, get extensive reporting etc. Go here to try it free w/o needing to sign up: http://www.moovatom.com/u http://www.moovatom.com/u

carson 16y ago

It seems like it is about time Vimeo did this although right now there is no indication that they actually have. The RRW story doesn't link to anything that has the announcement from them and there is nothing on the Vimeo site about it either.

nanairo 16y ago
Why is it "about time"? You make it sound like Vimeo is years behind the pack, but in fact---if my understanding is correct---they are at the front, at least in regards to other big video hosting such as Youtube.
- carson 16y ago
  I agree they aren't that far behind but it is frustrating that they have taken a while to do it. The reason I say frustrating is because I use Google reader on an iPhone/iPad and if the feed includes a Youtube video it gets pulled in as html5. Youtube has had support for html5 video for a while now. Hopefully this change by Vimeo will be reflected in Google reader now as well.
  - app 16y ago
    I haven't used Google Reader on an iPad/iPhone but I think it's unlikely YouTube is using HTML5 there. Mobile Safari actually has a built in parser for YouTube embed code, so nearly any YT embed will work even thought it's clearly an <embed> tag right to a SWF. Normally Mobile Safari will completely ignore *.swf URLs. So in some sense we're just now getting feature parity, in another we're ahead. Disclosure: I work for Vimeo.
    - carson 16y ago
      It looks like I wasn't remembering the Youtube announcement correctly. I was thinking of this: http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2010/05/little-bit-of-polish.html http://googlereader.blogspot.com/2010/05/little-bit-of-polis... I believe that just says they are letting video and audio tags through. When those are in the feed the ipad can play the video inline in reader. A little testing seems to show that they are also letting their iframe embed through as well and when you use that you do get the html5 version of the player on the ipad and iphone. It looks like the Vimeo iframe embed isn't allowed to pass though but hopefully they will allow it. I put together a demo feed that shows the difference if anyone is interested: http://serveany.s3.amazonaws.com/soclose.atom http://serveany.s3.amazonaws.com/soclose.atom

staunch 16y ago

Now will someone get Charlie Rose a damn Vimeo account so I can watch him on my iPad?

samratjp 16y ago

Sweet! I hope this will be just as fruitful as Scribd's transition to HTML5. iPad naysayers, whaddaya say ye now? Ha!