3 ms·
>> > If you oppose both then voting 3rd party is sill more useful than staying home. > Oh, certainly. but then you said: > A vote for a third party would be
by craftyguy 9y ago
>> > If you oppose both then voting 3rd party is sill more useful than staying home.
> Oh, certainly.
but then you said:
> A vote for a third party would be a waste
So, which is it?
- untog 9y agoYour citation missed my very next word after "certainly", which was "but". My clarification was that few people oppose both equally. If you oppose them equally then a third party vote is your best option. If you consider one to be a lesser evil, your best option is to vote for them. Just my opinion, of course, and one that is heavily biased as a result of the 2016 election.