5 ms·
This is why it is far more ethical to eat animals who have been raised in conditions that allow them to thrive happily and wholesomely. Factory farms are more-
by Valmar 9y ago
This is why it is far more ethical to eat animals who have been raised in conditions that allow them to thrive happily and wholesomely.
Factory farms are more-or-less a result of corporate capitalism and the greed for money.
- cageface 9y agoAgreed but about 99% of the meat we eat in the US comes from factory farms. So unless you only ever eat meat that you are sure comes from humanely treated animals, which pretty much means never ever eating in restaurants, you won't be eating much meat. Producing meat in this way also can't come close to supporting even current global demands for meat so it's not really a solution. https://www.huffingtonpost.com/nil-zacharias/its-time-to-end-factory-f_b_1018840.html https://www.huffingtonpost.com/nil-zacharias/its-time-to-end...
- Valmar 9y agoI'm certain a system could be devised to allow enough pasture-raised cattle, chickens and pigs to be raised in happy, healthy conditions until slaughtered for food. It would take more resources, but it would be worth it. It might also support the plant ecosystems more, because soyabean and grain monocultures won't be needed. However, the current Capitalist system's greed will ensure that this doesn't happen, because of the junk/fast food industry and their advertizing. Without junk/fast food's demands, the amount of meat required to sate the global population may actually shrink, because with proper education, food addiction may vanish, meaning we'll only need to eat what we actually need for nutrition and not for addiction's sake.
- cageface 9y agoThere is no way we can feed the entire population the amount of meat that Americans eat every day even with industrial farming practices, so there's no chance at all we can do it with sustainable, humane practices. The only way it would work is if people ate WAY less meat per person than Americans currently do: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/is-the-livestock-industry-destroying-the-planet-11308007/ https://www.smithsonianmag.com/travel/is-the-livestock-indus...
- Valmar 9y agoProblem with the US is the fast food industry. Eliminate that, educate people properly, and you need far less meat to sate the ridiculous demand.
- supreme_sublime 9y agoHow do you feel about hunting? For pretty much my entire life I've lived off venison that I (or someone in my family) has harvested.
- cageface 9y agoI think hunting out of necessity to survive is justified. Hunting for sport or pleasure seems cruel to me but I will say I have a lot more respect for people that kill & butcher their own meat than people that buy it in a pretty shrink wrapped container in the supermarket and do their best to not think about what it really is.
- JamesLefrere 9y ago>This is why it is far more ethical to eat animals who have been raised in conditions that allow them to thrive happily and wholesomely. I used to think that, but it's not a defensible point of view if you examine it a little more critically. Animals like pigs (or rather, their very very recent wild ancestors) have needs and behaviours that simply aren't useful to agriculture, and they can't possibly life fulfilling lives (not to mention that they should also be living for about 15 years rather than under a year). The least we can do is to not eat them. It took me a long time to accept that, but that's how it is.
- Valmar 9y ago> Animals like pigs (or rather, their very very recent wild ancestors) have needs and behaviours that simply aren't useful to agriculture, and they can't possibly life fulfilling lives (not to mention that they should also be living for about 15 years rather than under a year). Why does it have to be about usefulness? They can live happy lives close enough to how they might live in the wild, at least until they're killed, if for food, no?