Looks like we've wandered into the ridiculous. >They are claiming the normal state of affairs - that the vote is what it appears to be Except that the "normal

Looks like we've wandered into the ridiculous. >They are claiming the normal state of affairs - that the vote is what it appears to be Except that the "normal state of affairs" is not a "normal state" any more than PCs are inherently secure. Of course they're making a claim. It's asinine to suggest otherwise. BTW, the whole reptiloid/nibiru analogy doesn't work here. Never did. >Which anomalities? So far nobody named even one. She claimed statistical anomalies, as well as others. They're not in the linked article, but it's easy enough to Google her name. >What prevents one from faking 10000 anonymous IDs Wait. Is there a threat or isn't there one? First you're asserting that the normal state is safe. Now you're concerned about 10000 fake anonymous IDs that could arise from taking extra measures to secure the election. >use blockchain. I know, it's easy to bash blockchain. It happens to be a potential solution to your fake anonymous IDs, but never-mind that. Really, it sounds like you're just arguing for the sake of arguing. Enjoy yourself.