4 ms·
Interesting that it's more substantial on older CPU's. The cynic in me wonders if that's a way to force an upgrade from CPU's that normally would be fine for mo
by chrishynes 9y ago
Interesting that it's more substantial on older CPU's. The cynic in me wonders if that's a way to force an upgrade from CPU's that normally would be fine for most typical office use.
- Someone1234 9y agoThis has absolutely destroyed Intel's reputation and handed a massive PR win to their competitors (including AMD). Hard to imagine any normal company cutting out their own feet so willingly, this will cost Intel a lot more than it will make them in short term revenue.
- throwawayfinal 9y agoI'm not sure how they could have come out of this cleanly other than waving a wand and not having it happen? They pretty clearly owned up.
- thisacctforreal 9y agoDid we see the same PR announcement? It was misleading in multiple ways.
- QAPereo 9y agoReally? I thought they were still denying that this is a flaw, and not, “working as intended.”
- lovich 9y agoThey sat on it for over quarter and gave no indication that any sort of trouble was coming up. The CEO even sold stock and made a profit after being made aware of the issue, but before having the issue be announced publicly. I would not classify that as clearly owning up
- WillReplyfFood 9y agoDo what i do, when my android phone constantly flashes a light & sound notification after finnishing loading the battery- call your software representetive. It really helps against insomnia, if you wake some poor android developer halft the world away in the middle of the night to suffer with you - for his implementation of planned obsolence. Two souls united in burning hatred.