4 ms·
I will certainly agree that requiring JavaScript unnecessarily should be frowned on and progressive enhancement should be the norm. A least give user the option
by EgoIncarnate 9y ago
I will certainly agree that requiring JavaScript unnecessarily should be frowned on and progressive enhancement should be the norm. A least give user the option of taking on additional security risks associated with Javascript (and WebAssembly) or not (edit: where possible).
- SquareWheel 9y agoAgreed to a point. For some apps user interaction is required, and progressive enhancement isn't possible. For non-apps though, it's still very important. Articles should not require a JS bundle to load. When JS is used, it should be optimized.
- EgoIncarnate 9y agoUnfortunately the web seems to be moving away from a progressive enhancement world. Momentum seems to be with whatever is easiest. JavaScript frameworks, analytics companies, and ad companies would probably all have to make progressive enhancement the default way for that to change.