4 ms·
>In British civil law, the driver is always culpable in an accident involving a minor, even if sober and below the speed limit, which I was. This seems like a
by rev_bird 9y ago
>In British civil law, the driver is always culpable in an accident involving a minor, even if sober and below the speed limit, which I was.
This seems like a weird construct, particularly given that minors do such stupid things. Two of them, together, literally ran into traffic, and the default is "blame traffic"?
- CalRobert 9y agoBlaming traffic is appropriate. For most of history it was very normal for people to run in to the street. It was a place for horses, carts, donkeys, people, and livestock, and more than that, it was a place for socializing _and_ transport _and_ commerce. Then, a few wealthy folks showed up in their automobiles and said "GET OUT OF MY WAY OR I WILL KILL YOU" and oddly, we sided with them. https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jaywalking/1837/ https://www.citylab.com/transportation/2012/04/invention-jay... has more.
- megy 9y agoNot at all. You are creating the dangerous situation in the first place. If you weren't driving, people could run across the road without fear of getting hit by you.