4 ms·
Whoa there. Calm down buddy. Before you bust out the pitchforks, he just asked them to post tweets. The cost to them is zero in money, and virtually zero in tim
by kindfellow92 9y ago
Whoa there. Calm down buddy. Before you bust out the pitchforks, he just asked them to post tweets. The cost to them is zero in money, and virtually zero in time.
Couple that with the fact that he was providing them with a free service and I only see a morally net positive contribution from him.
- StavrosK 9y ago> The cost to them is zero in money, and virtually zero in time. Ah yes, just like spam. > Couple that with the fact that he was providing them with a free service He wasn't. He was just giving them an error message after they Tweeted what he wanted.
- kindfellow92 9y ago> He wasn't. He was just giving them an error message after they Tweeted what he wanted. Did you read the entire post? His service is available to India right now. Their tweets helped make that possible. It’s strange to me that you hate someone who provides a valuable service to people.
- StavrosK 9y agoDid you read the entire post? > And they did! All these users started following Browserling and tweeting about it. But they still couldn't use Browserling or Whatsapp, it was just a new message in place of "fatal error". > It’s strange to me that you hate someone who provides a valuable service to people. I don't care enough about him to hate him. I just said I think he's an asshole.
- kindfellow92 9y agoSomething is off if you think he’s an asshole and his users in India don’t.
- monkpit 9y agoAnd how do you know they don’t?
- kindfellow92 9y agoOn average it’s likely they don’t given they are using his product.