From the article: > while maintaining the [...] privacy benefits of AMP Cache serving "AMP Cache serving" == hosted on Google's server. This makes this statem

From the article: > while maintaining the [...] privacy benefits of AMP Cache serving "AMP Cache serving" == hosted on Google's server. This makes this statement at best, stupidly oxymoronic, at worst, deliberately dishonest advertising. > privacy reasons make it basically impossible to load the page from the publisher’s server. Browsers (including Firefox[0][1]) already do this. There are no "privacy reasons" preventing this. The only reason not to do this is to present another justification for opting into their AMP Cache product. > can take advantage of privacy-preserving preloading and the performance of Google’s servers Also a contradiction of terms. [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Link_prefetching_FAQ https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTTP/Link_prefe... [1] https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1016628 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1016628