>Actually the opposite, by taxing land in high demand urban cores it would incentivize more efficient use of the land That's exactly what I was saying. The own

>Actually the opposite, by taxing land in high demand urban cores it would incentivize more efficient use of the land That's exactly what I was saying. The owners of inner city land pay very little cost for monopolizing land that could be put to better use. It's a store of value that is unlikely to go down in value. There is nothing to offset the instinct to hoard. >The same generation has now pulled the ladder up behind them to spit down on future generations. All of the "it was boomers what done it" is just the 1% playing identity politics as a means of scapegoating and divide and conquer. At the end of the day, the 1% millenial children of 1% boomers are going to be the beneficiaries of this ladder pull-up.